WhatsApp Channel Join Now
Telegram Group Join Now
| Relevance: GS-II (Indian Constitution, Judiciary, Parliament) | Source: Parliament Inquiry Reports, 2026 |
1 · What is the core issue in simple words?
| Judges are meant to be the ultimate guardians of the law. But what happens when a judge breaks the law? Recently, a fire broke out at the official Delhi home of a High Court judge. Shockingly, firefighters found piles of partially burnt ₹500 currency notes hidden in a storeroom. This led to a massive uproar. Members of Parliament (MPs) demanded his removal, and a special inquiry committee was formed. Although the judge abruptly resigned to escape the investigation, the committee still found him guilty of possessing unexplained wealth and destroying evidence. |
2 · The Impeachment Process (Step-by-Step)
|
Step 1: The Trigger
After the unaccounted cash was found, nearly 200 MPs signed a motion in Parliament demanding the judge’s removal for “proved misbehaviour.” |
| ▼ |
|
Step 2: The Official Probe
The Lok Sabha Speaker formed a strict 3-member committee headed by a Supreme Court judge to legally investigate these serious charges. |
| ▼ |
|
Step 3: The Resignation Tactic
Sensing trouble, the judge abruptly resigned and refused to participate in the probe, claiming the investigation was unfair and biased. |
| ▼ |
|
Step 4: The Landmark Ruling
The committee set a new precedent: a judge cannot unilaterally stop a statutory inquiry just by resigning once evidence has been recorded. All charges were declared “proved.” |
3 · Key Constitutional Concepts Explained Simply
|
Article 124(4) & 218
The Removal Rule
The Constitution says a Supreme Court or High Court judge can only be removed by the President, and only after both houses of Parliament pass a motion with a special majority.
|
Proved Misbehaviour
The Only Excuse
Judges cannot be fired just because the government dislikes them. They can only be removed for “proved misbehaviour” (like corruption) or “incapacity” (medical inability).
|
|
Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
The 3-Member Team
This law dictates that the investigating committee must strictly have three members: a Supreme Court judge, a High Court Chief Justice, and a distinguished legal expert.
|
The Escape Route
Infructuous Motions
Historically, when faced with an impeachment vote in Parliament, guilty judges simply resign beforehand. This makes the final vote useless (infructuous).
|
| UPSC Prelims Quick Facts: Starting an Inquiry | ||||||||
|
| MCQ Practice Question |
Q. With reference to the procedure for the removal of a High Court Judge in India, consider the following statements:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? |
Answer: (b) 1 and 3 only
|
Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success
Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.



