| Relevance: GS-II Government Policies · GS-III Cyber Security & Internal Security | Source: Delhi HC affidavit, June 2026 |
1 · What happened
|
After India temporarily blocked Telegram (to protect the NEET re-exam on 21 June), the company took the government to the Delhi High Court. Defending the ban, the Centre filed an affidavit (a sworn written statement) calling Telegram the “new dark web” — a haven for criminals, fraudsters, terror groups and paper-leak gangs. The government’s lawyer, Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, said the firm ignored repeated requests to clean up illegal channels. Telegram replied that the government should block specific content, not the whole app used by 150 million Indians. The Court raised the same worry — why punish 150 million people for the acts of a few — and then reserved its judgment (will decide later). |
2 · Why call it the “new dark web”?
| Basics: the “deep web” is any online content not shown by normal search engines. The “dark web” is a hidden corner of it, reachable only with special tools, often used to hide crime. The Centre’s claim is that Telegram now does the same job — letting criminals act in the open yet stay untraceable. |
|
The charge
Anonymity as a weapon
Users can hide phone numbers and run bots and fake accounts — so paper leaks, scams, child-abuse material and terror propaganda spread while culprits stay hidden.
|
How money moves
Mule accounts & dark links
Channels trade “mule” bank accounts (rented accounts used to launder stolen money) and post links to dark-web forums. Blocked channels are instantly replaced by new ones.
|
|
The watchdog
I4C steps in
The Centre’s case leans on the I4C (Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre), India’s nodal cyber-crime body, which flagged Telegram’s “structural” weaknesses.
|
The balancing act
Rights vs security
The Court must weigh national security against the rights of crores of honest users — the heart of the “whole-app ban vs targeted block” debate.
|
3 · The scale of the Problem
As per the government’s affidavit, cyber-crime complaints linked to Telegram on the NCRP jumped from about 75,688 in 2023 to roughly 2.75 lakh in 2025, with the linked fraud reportedly crossing ₹3,000 crore. The government argued that when illegal content becomes this “rampant,” it is technically impossible to separate the unlawful from the lawful — so it blocked the whole platform. Critics counter that this is a blunt tool that hits millions of innocent users.
| UPSC Value Box | ||||||||||||||
|
| MCQ Practice Question |
Q. With reference to the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), consider the following statements:
Which of the statements given above is/are correct? |
Answer: (a) 1 and 2 only
|
Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success
Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.





