1. The Growth Problem
The main goal was to make manufacturing a much bigger slice of India’s economic pie. But the needle hasn’t moved much.
- Missing the Big Target: The dream was for manufacturing to make up 25% of the economy. Today, it sits at just 15.6%—which is actually slightly lower than when the campaign started 12 years ago.
- The Export Illusion: Yes, our non-oil exports grew to $388 billion. But if you look at the 12 years before Make in India (2002-2014), our exports grew at a much faster rate.
- Stuck on the Global Stage: Back in 2013, India accounted for 1.7% of all global exports. Fast forward to today, and we are still stuck at that exact same 1.7%. We haven’t grabbed a bigger piece of the world market.
The Stagnation in Numbers:
2. Why are Private Companies Hesitant?
To build a manufacturing powerhouse, private companies need to spend their own money to build new factories. Right now, they are holding back.
- Declining Investments: A metric called Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) tracks how much companies spend on physical assets like machinery. As a percentage of our GDP, this spending has been dropping since 2022.
- The 80% Rule: Factories in India are currently running below 80% of their total capacity. Historically, business owners will not spend money to build a new factory until their current one crosses that 80% usage mark.
- Loans for Survival: Banks are lending more money to small businesses, but experts warn this cash is mostly being used to pay daily bills (working capital) rather than buying new equipment to expand.
3. Way Forward: The Danger of Uneven Success
The government’s latest strategy is bringing in massive investments, but it highlights a major flaw in how we create jobs.
- The PLI Boost: The Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme is essentially paying companies cash bonuses for manufacturing goods in India. It has successfully attracted over ₹2.4 lakh crore in investments.
- Too Narrow: The catch? A massive 83% of this money went to just five highly specialized sectors, like solar panels, electronics, and pharmaceuticals.
- The Missing Jobs: High-tech factories use robots and machines, not millions of workers. To solve India’s unemployment crisis, we desperately need to boost labor-heavy industries—like clothing, shoes, and leather—which have largely missed out on this massive funding.
‘Make in India’ successfully modernized some impressive high-tech industries. But true self-reliance means building a manufacturing base broad enough to give millions of struggling farmers a better job in the city.
Mains Practice Question
Evaluate the performance of the ‘Make in India’ initiative over the past decade. How does the concentrated success of the PLI scheme reflect structural challenges in India’s job creation mandate? (15 marks · 250 words)
Introduction: Briefly state the ambitious original goals of Make in India (25% GDP share, 100 million jobs) and contrast it with the current stagnation.
Body Part 1 (The Stagnation): Highlight data showing the falling Gross Fixed Capital Formation (private investment hesitation), stagnant 1.7% global export share, and a GVA that is barely above 15%.
Body Part 2 (The PLI Paradox): Explain how the PLI scheme succeeded in generating ₹2.4 lakh crore, but point out that 83% of it went to capital-intensive, high-tech sectors (like solar and electronics).
Conclusion: Conclude that to fix the unemployment crisis, policies must pivot aggressively toward labor-intensive sectors (like textiles and leather) to absorb the massive agricultural workforce.
Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success
Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.