Relevance: Science & Tech (Biotech, Ethics) • Source: UNESCO, The Hindu
Neurotechnology includes tools that monitor, read, or modify brain activity—from brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to implants helping paralysed people move. With rapid commercial and medical expansion, UNESCO has issued the first global ethical guidelines to safeguard mental privacy and human autonomy.
Why Oversight Is Needed
- Neurotech market projected to touch USD 24 billion by 2030.
- Devices can influence behaviour, extract thoughts, alter emotions.
- Risks: privacy breaches, manipulation, coercion, inequity, and misuse in workplaces, policing, military.
UNESCO’s Ethical Framework (Concise Overview)
A. Core “Neurorights”
Right | What it Protects |
| Mental Privacy | Brain data cannot be extracted or sold without consent. |
| Cognitive Liberty | Freedom to use or refuse neurotech. |
| Psychological Continuity | Protection of identity; no alteration without consent. |
B. Responsible Use & Regulation
- Mandatory safety checks, clinical standards, and pre-approval.
- Oversight of dual-use tech (civil + military).
- Ban coercive use in workplaces or forced treatment.
- Strong data governance — neurodata treated as sensitive personal data.
C. Protecting Vulnerable Groups
- Extra safeguards for children, elderly, persons with disabilities.
- Clear rules for therapeutic vs. enhancement use.
Relevance for India
- India lacks a dedicated neurotech law; current oversight is via ICMR, Drugs & Cosmetics Rules, and emerging Digital India Act.
- UNESCO’s framework can guide India in building ethical guardrails, especially as BCI research expands in IITs, AIIMS, and defence-funded labs.
Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!
Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success
Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.

