Relevance: GS-2/GS-3 (Federalism; Disaster Management) | Source: The Hindu, NDMA Act 2005

The July 2024 Wayanad landslide (≈300 deaths) exposed a deep fiscal mismatch: Kerala sought ₹2,200 crore for relief and reconstruction, while the Union immediately approved only ₹260 crore.
This pattern, repeated across States, highlights structural weaknesses in India’s disaster-finance architecture and the fraying edges of cooperative federalism.

How India’s Disaster Financing Works

  • State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF): Jointly funded by Centre–State (75:25; 90:10 for Himalayan and North-eastern States). Used for immediate relief.
  • National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF): Fully Centrally funded. Supplements SDRF for major calamities.
  • Disaster Management Act, 2005: Legal framework empowering the Centre to assist States when resources fall short.

Core Problems Revealed

  • Outdated norms: Compensation ceilings unchanged for years, not aligned with today’s reconstruction costs.
  • Ambiguous disaster categories: “Severe disaster” classification unclear, delaying NDRF aid.
  • Excessive red tape: Multiple-stage clearances, state memoranda, and central assessments slow transfers.
  • Weak allocation formula: Population/geography-based norms ignore vulnerability, hazard intensity, and poverty.
  • Political friction: Discretionary approvals erode federal trust and delay urgent support.

Global Lessons & Reform Options

Country / SystemKey FeatureWhy Relevant for India
United States (FEMA)Data-driven disaster triggersEnables rapid, neutral federal support
Mexico (FONDEN)Automatic payouts based on rainfall/fatality indicatorsReduces discretion and delays
Philippines (Quick Response Funds)Pre-authorised funds with objective criteriaEnsures fast, accountable disbursal

Suggested Reforms for India

  • Objective disaster triggers: Rainfall thresholds, casualty ratios per million population, or loss-to-GSDP indicators.
  • Shift to grant-based support: Avoid debt-creating disaster assistance.
  • Update compensation norms to reflect current economic realities.
  • Automatic advance releases to SDRF during high-risk seasons for liquidity.
  • Vulnerability-weighted allocation index: Combine hazard exposure, poverty, and adaptive capacity.
  • Enhance State control over operational spending; Centre limited to verification and top-ups.

A rules-based, trigger-driven funding model would strengthen both disaster preparedness and cooperative federalism, replacing ad-hoc decisions with predictable, science-based support.

UPSC Mains Question

“Examine the limitations of India’s disaster financing framework. How can rule-based transfers strengthen both disaster response and federal cooperation?”

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success

Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.