Relevance: GS I (Society), GS II (Governance), GS IV (Ethics)
Source: Indian Express, Constitution of India

Public Religiosity in India: Tradition and the New Challenge

India has always expressed religion publicly—Navratri, Muharram, Eid prayers, church feasts, Guruparab processions, temple rath yatras. What is new today is the scale, noise, frequency and politicisation of these activities.
Loudspeakers from mosques and temples, all-night jagrans, processions at airports and railway stations, and traffic-stopping ceremonies reflect a shift from devotion to display, intensifying tensions in shared urban spaces.

Constitutional & Legal Framework Governing Public Religious Expression

Key provisions determine what is allowed, restricted, or regulated.

A. Constitutional Provisions

Article

Relevance

Article 25Freedom of religion, subject to public order, morality, health, and other FRs
Article 26Rights of religious denominations (manage institutions), again subject to public order
Article 19(1)(a)/(b)Free speech & assembly, but reasonable restrictions under Art. 19(2)/(3)
Article 21Right to life includes freedom from harmful noise (SC: Noise = health hazard)
Article 14State must regulate equally, preventing majoritarian dominance

B. Relevant Laws & Rules

Law / Rule

Provision

Noise Pollution (Regulation & Control) Rules, 2000Time restrictions (10 p.m.–6 a.m.), decibel limits
CrPC Sections 129–144Crowd control, curbs on unlawful assemblies
IPC Sections 295–298Prohibit acts that insult religion or provoke tensions
SC Judgments (essential practices doctrine)Only essential religious practices get full protection

Thus, public religious expression is allowed but not absolute — it must not violate others’ rights or public order.

Why Public Expressions Are Becoming Contentious

Factor

Explanation

Noise & civic disruptionLoudspeakers, blocked roads, stalled ambulances
Competitive religiosityOne group’s display fuels another’s—symbolic assertion
Political mobilisationFestivals used for visibility, messaging, crowd mobilisation
Weak enforcementNoise rules ignored; permissions arbitrary
Minority anxietyDominant-community visibility creates fear of marginalisation

The result is a shift from celebration to confrontation, eroding shared civic space.

Regulating Public Devotion: A Balanced, Constitutional Approach

Public celebrations should not be avoided—but they must be regulated to ensure fairness, safety, and equality.

Balanced Approach Table

Concern

Constitutional Basis

Practical Regulation

Noise pollutionArt. 21 (right to health) + Noise RulesTime-window rules, decibel limits
Traffic obstructionArt. 19(5) limits on movementDesignated routes, emergency lanes
Communal tensionArt. 14 (equal protection)Equal permissions; community mediation
Political misuseMCC + Art. 325 (free elections)No political messaging in religious events
Minority protectionArt. 15 (non-discrimination)Ensure equal access to public space
Essential vs non-essentialSC’s Essential Practices TestRegulate non-essential rituals

This ensures religious freedom without civic chaos.

What This Reveals About Indian Polity

  • Public religiosity increasingly reflects identity assertion, not just devotion.
  • Growing trend of religious processions entering airports, highways, stations reflects the shrinking of private vs public boundaries.
  • Political actors often use religious displays to mobilise majorities.
  • Citizens’ rights to silence, movement and health are compromised, weakening secular governance.

One-line Wrap

India must protect both religious freedom and civic order by regulating—rather than avoiding—public expressions of devotion.

UPSC Mains Question

How can India constitutionally regulate public religious expressions to protect fundamental rights while ensuring communal harmony?

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!

Start Yours at Ajmal IAS – with Mentorship StrategyDisciplineClarityResults that Drives Success

Your dream deserves this moment — begin it here.