Syllabus: GS-II: Local Government

Why in the news?

The Supreme Court of India has pulled up the Maharashtra State Election Commission (SEC) for repeatedly failing to hold long-overdue local-body elections and has directed that all local-body polls in the State must be completed by 31 January 2026. The top court criticised the SEC’s non-compliance with earlier directions and rejected the Commission’s pleas for further extensions.

Current situation

• Urban local bodies: Maharashtra has 29 municipal corporations (including newly created corporations such as Jalna and Ichalkaranji), ~248 municipal councils and numerous nagar panchayats — many of which have been run by administrators because elections were not held. 
• Several mainstream reports say the state’s major urban local bodies, including the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), have lacked elected representatives since 2022.
• Rural local bodies: Over 80–85% of rural local bodies have been functioning under administrators, with large numbers of zilla parishads and panchayat samitis without elected members.
• Economic scale: The BMC—the country’s richest municipal corporation—manages a budget in excess of ₹74,000 crore (2025–26) even while functioning under an administrator.
  

Why have elections been repeatedly delayed?

The delay is multi-factorial. The main reasons are:

1. Legal-reservation complexities

• The principal trigger is the prolonged litigation and process around OBC political reservation in local bodies. 
• SC in earlier orders (2010 onwards) required states to conduct a “rigorous empirical inquiry” (the so-called triple-test) before granting OBC reservation in local bodies. 
• In March 2021 the Court reiterated and clarified conditions (the three-fold/test approach), and in Maharashtra the State set up the Banthia (Dedicated) Commission in March 2022; its report (July 2022) recommending a particular OBC share has been challenged in courts. 
• The legal uncertainty about seat-wise reservations has repeatedly impeded final ward formation, reservation draws and therefore notification of polls.

2. Judicial delays and conflicting interim directions

• Multiple petitions, counter-petitions and stays in various High Courts and the Supreme Court have produced a stop-start pattern. 
• At times the Court has directed elections without OBC reservation if the triple-test is not completed; at other times it has directed elections with the pre-2022 reservation — inconsistent outcomes that complicate administrative action and create the risk of elected representatives being potentially disqualified later.

3. Administrative and procedural excuses

• The State Election Commission cited logistical constraints — shortage of EVMs, unavailability of school premises during board exams, shortage of officers and staff, and ongoing delimitation/ward formation exercises — to justify postponements. 
• SC has dismissed many of these as avoidable administrative laxity.

4. Political calculations and lack of will

• Delimitation and reservation outcomes alter political arithmetic in urban wards and rural circles. 
• Multiple actors (state government, municipal commissioners, political parties) have incentives to delay or seek advantage — which has at points reduced the political will to push timely elections. Media and expert commentary point to political calculus playing a role in the protracted delay.

What is the OBC-reservation issue? 

• Constitutional provision: Articles introduced by the 73rd & 74th Amendments allow states to reserve seats in Panchayats and Municipalities for backward classes, but do not prescribe the method. 
• The Supreme Court has said states must empirically justify (via a rigorous, data-driven “triple-test”) the need and quantum of OBC reservations at local-body level.
  
• Triple-test (essence): The state must:
  • Show empirical evidence of social/economic/political backwardness in the specific local body area, 
  • Determine the exact proportion of seats to be reserved based on that evidence, and 
  • Ensure that total reservations across categories do not exceed constitutional limits and local fairness principles. 
• Failure to conduct/publish a credible door-to-door/empirical study invites judicial intervention.
• Maharashtra: The Banthia Commission (set up March 2022; report July 2022) recommended a certain percentage for OBCs (report challenged), and conflicting interim judicial orders (and litigation by political groups/individuals) have frozen decisive action. 
• The Supreme Court in May 2025 directed the SEC to proceed with elections using pre-Banthia reservation numbers (but litigation remains, producing the risk of retrospective fallout).
  

How is the delay affecting governance and people? 

1. Democratic Deficit and Weak Political Accountability

• Absence of elected representatives in 29 municipal corporations, 248 municipal councils, and hundreds of Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis means citizens lack political representation at the grassroots.
• Decision-making is concentrated in the hands of administrators and bureaucrats, leading to reduced transparency and accountability.
• Example: The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) has been run by an administrator since March 2022.

2. Decline in Quality and Pace of Local Development

• Bureaucrats, meant to execute decisions, are now forced to formulate policies, which they are institutionally not designed to do.
• Routine civic works — water supply, sanitation, waste management, road maintenance — face delays due to lack of political prioritisation.
• Example: Multiple municipalities, including Pune and Nagpur, report project stagnation due to absence of elected committees to approve or monitor contracts.

3. Ignorance of Local Needs and Reduced Citizen Participation

• Local grievances, such as drainage, health centres, or encroachment issues, remain unaddressed due to the loss of local political channels (corporators, council meetings, Gram Sabhas).
• Citizens must now depend on MLAs, MPs, or guardian ministers, who operate at a larger scale and cannot respond to every local issue.
• Democratic engagement at the grassroots has weakened, reducing citizens’ faith in self-governance.

4. Bureaucratic Overload and Inefficient Governance

• One IAS officer or collector now handles responsibilities across several municipalities, leading to administrative fatigue and slow execution.
• The focus shifts to routine file work rather than developmental vision or participatory decision-making.
• Bureaucrats are not politically accountable to the public — leading to policy inertia and lack of responsiveness.
  

5. Disruption of Local Economic and Infrastructure Projects

• In the absence of elected bodies, budget approvals, project tenders, and development plans are delayed.
• Municipal Standing Committees, which approve civic expenditure, are non-functional — halting infrastructure projects like roads, flyovers, and water schemes.
• Example: Mumbai’s storm-water drainage and waste segregation projects have faced delays due to absence of political oversight committees.

6. Fiscal Mismanagement and Transparency Concerns

• Large civic budgets are being managed solely by administrators, leading to a lack of checks and balances.
• Public consultations on budget priorities have disappeared; this undermines fiscal accountability and public scrutiny.
• The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has previously flagged financial opacity in several urban local bodies functioning under administrators.
  

7. Rural Governance Paralysis

• In rural areas, 32 out of 34 Zilla Parishads and 336 of 351 Panchayat Samitis lack elected representatives.
• Developmental programs under Mahatma Gandhi NREGA, PM Awas Yojana, and rural roads schemes face bottlenecks due to missing political leadership at district and block levels.
• The Gram Sabha’s empowerment — a constitutional mandate under the 73rd Amendment — is effectively undermined.

8. Political Alienation and Democratic Apathy

• Citizens have no direct political platform to express concerns or hold officials accountable.
• This alienation risks lower voter turnout and increased disillusionment with the democratic process.
• Urban youth, especially in cities like Mumbai, Pune, and Nashik, are growing indifferent to local governance — weakening democratic culture.
  

9. Strain on Higher Political Representatives

• MPs and MLAs are being overburdened with local civic grievances — from potholes to garbage collection — issues that should ideally be handled by corporators or councillors.
• This distracts legislators from their core law-making and state-level oversight roles, leading to inefficiency across governance levels.
  

10. Violation of Constitutional Mandate

• The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments mandate that local body elections must be held every five years, and in case of dissolution, within six months.
• The continuous delay undermines this constitutional obligation and weakens India’s federal democratic structure.
• It also sets a dangerous precedent for other states to bypass the constitutional norm of timely elections.

Thus, the prolonged delay in Maharashtra’s local body elections has caused a democratic vacuum, a developmental slowdown, and institutional erosion of local governance. What should be citizen-centric, participatory, and accountable governance has turned into bureaucrat-driven administration, reducing responsiveness and undermining the spirit of grassroots democracy envisioned by the Constitution.

Legal and constitutional background — 73rd & 74th Amendments 

• 73rd Amendment (1992): Constitutionalised Panchayati Raj (Part IX). 
• Key features: Three-tier PRIs, five-year term, reservation for SC/ST and at least one-third seats for women, state finance commissions, Gram Sabhas and schedule of functions (11th Schedule). 
• States must hold regular elections; supersession requires fresh polls within six months.
• 74th Amendment (1992): Constitutionalised urban local bodies (Part IXA). 
• It introduced provisions for municipalities (Articles 243P–243ZG), added 12th Schedule (urban functions), fixed five-year term for municipalities, and vested State Election Commissions with conduct of local polls (Article 243K and 243ZA). 
• These amendments make local government a constitutional obligation and link elections, devolution and finances to democratic local governance.
  

Why central judicial interventions (and delays) are problematic

• Judicial intervention is necessary when processes are arbitrary, but interim and inconsistent orders (e.g., some polls held without OBC reservations while later the SC asks for pre-Banthia reservation) create legal and administrative uncertainty and the spectre of retrospective annulments. 
• Scholars and policy analysts warn that litigation should not substitute for timely and transparent administrative action.
  

Way forward 

1. Time-bound, transparent triple-test with standard methodology
   
   • Mandate a clear, public methodology for the triple-test (door-to-door enumeration, socio-economic indicators, political representation metrics) with independent auditors and fixed deadlines. State governments must publish raw data and commission peer review.
     
2. Fast-track judicial timelines for election-critical litigation
   
   • Create procedural rules in High Courts and the Supreme Court to prioritise election-related disputes and set strict timelines (e.g., list within X weeks). Consider constitutionally-mandated bench windows for election matters.
     
3. Strengthen SEC capacity and insulate it from executive delay
   
   • Provide statutory timelines for SEC action, strengthen staffing pools (reserve trained officials for elections), and create contingency plans for EVMs/staffing (national ECI support deployment where needed). The SEC must publish monthly action-plans and progress dashboards.
     
4. Delimitation & reservation calendar
   
   • Fix a delimitation–reservation–notification calendar (e.g., 60–30–30 days) that cannot be extended arbitrarily. Use GIS and automated tools to speed ward-formation with statutory public-consultation windows.
     
5. Interim democratic safeguards
   
   • Where unavoidable short delays occur, mandate consultative oversight bodies (local advisory councils with party representation and civil society) to provide political input and oversight rather than sole bureaucracy rule.
     
6. Restore devolution & fiscal autonomy
   
   • Ensure local bodies have function, funds and functionaries (Article 243W/243X) to prevent administrative bloat and to make elections meaningful. State Finance Commissions must be empowered and their recommendations implemented.
     
7. Political accountability & norms
   
   • Political parties should publicly commit to timelines for polls; Election Commission of India and national bodies should issue model codes for state governments to ensure timely election conduct.
     

Conclusion

Maharashtra’s prolonged postponement of local-body elections is not merely an administrative glitch — it is a constitutional and democratic problem. While legal complexities over OBC reservations and the need for empirical evidence are real and legitimate, they cannot become permanent pretexts for derailing grassroots democracy. Timely reforms — procedural, institutional and judicial — backed by political will are essential to restore electoral normalcy, accountability and citizen-centric local governance.

UPSC Mains Question

1. Examine the causes and consequences of the prolonged delay in local-body elections in Maharashtra. In your answer, discuss the constitutional safeguards provided by the 73rd and 74th Amendments and suggest institutional and legal reforms to ensure timely conduct of local elections. (250 words)

SOURCE